MICHAEL JONES, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
MICHAEL JONES, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
677 So. 2d 103
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1996)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We remand this Anders1 appeal for the purpose of correcting a clerical error in the sentence and order of probation. Both reflect that the defendant entered a plea of guilty while the record reflects that he entered a plea of nolo contendere.
REMANDED.
PETERSON, C.J., and GRIFFIN and ANTOON, JJ., concur. . Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Crittenden v. State, 684 So. 2d 857 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)…s are aggravated forms of the same underlying offense of theft, distinguished only by degree factors. We agree that appellant cannot be convicted of robbery and theft based upon the same act of taking the same property by force. See Hawkes v. State, 677 So. 2d 103 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Ricks v. State, 656 So. 2d 633 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). Accordingly, the judgment and sentence for grand theft is reversed. In all other respects it is affirmed. JUDGMENT and SENTENCE AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part. COBB and H…
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)