OSCAR A. WHITE, MOISES SAPORTA, GLADYS SAPORTA, JOSE ABUT, JEANNETTE ABUT, SALOMON WORTHALTER AND MINNIE WORTHALTER, APPELLANTS.
v.
MIAMI ELECTRONICS CENTER, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
The judgment below dismissing the appellants’ action for partition is affirmed because (a) there was no showing of a cotenancy on which to bottom such an action as required by section 64.031, Fla. Stat. (1995); see Weed v. Knox, 157 Fla. 896, 27 So. 2d 419 (1946); Serkissian v. Newman, 85 Fla. 388, 96 So. 378 (1923); Barden v. Pappas, 532 So. 2d 707 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988), and (b) the effect of any partition would be inequitably to interfere with the enforcement of the agreement specifically approved in Miami Electronics Center, Inc., v. Saporta, 597 So. 2d 903 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), review denied, 613 So. 2d 8 (Fla.1992). See Fisher v. Davenport, 84 So. 2d 910 (Fla.1956); Rosen v. Marlin, 486 So. 2d 623 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); review denied, 494 So. 2d 1151 (Fla.1986); Peacock v. Peacock, 439 So. 2d 984 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Cohen v. Roth, 417 So. 2d 743 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
J.M.S. v. State, 921 So. 2d 813 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)…argument. M.E.F. v. State, 595 So. 2d 86, 87 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). See also S.G. v. State, 678 So. 2d 495, 495 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996) (reversing adjudications after trial court refused to permit closing argument in delinquency proceeding); T.W. v. State, 677 So. 2d 111, 111 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (accord); T. McD. v. State, 607 So. 2d 513, 513 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992) (accord); E.C. v. State, 588 So. 2d 698, 699 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991) (accord); E.V.R. v. State, 342 So. 2d 93, 94 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977) (accord). The State counters…
-
D.B. v. State, 979 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)…he prejudice to D.B. We disagree. D.B. directs our attention to a series of appellate decisions wherein juvenile defendants were denied the right to present a closing argument. See J.M.S. v. State, 921 So. 2d 813 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); T.W. v. State, 677 So. 2d 111 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); T. McD. v. State, 607 So. 2d 513 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); M.E.F. v. State, 595 So. 2d 86 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); E.C. v. State, 588 So. 2d 698 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); E.V.R. v. State, 342 So. 2d 93 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). Invariably, those court…
Authorities Cited
- Murray Rosen v. Marlin, 486 So. 2d 623 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)
- Nell Weed v. Knox, 157 Fla. 896 (Fla. 1946)
- Serkissian v. Newman, 85 Fla. 388 (Fla. 1923)
- Sanders v. State, 157 Fla. 896 (Fla. 1946)
- Miami Elecs. Ctr., Inc. v. Moises Saporta and Gladys Saporta, 597 So. 2d 903 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)
- Barden v. Pappas, 532 So. 2d 707 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988)
- Fisher v. Inez Davenport, 84 So. 2d 910 (Fla. 1956)
- Cohen v. Roth, 417 So. 2d 743 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
- Valdes v. State, 439 So. 2d 984 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
- Peacock v. Peacock, 439 So. 2d 984 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)