ANA PUTNAM, APPELLANT,

v.

JOSEPH G. WARD, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Ducharme v. State, 690 So. 2d 1358 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997)
  …(c), or (d) would require a level 4 ranking mandating the assessment of 22 points consistent with a felony of the second degree. See §§ 921.0013(2) and 921.0014(1); Jenkins v. State, 661 So. 2d 411, 412 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); accord Newberry v. State, 677 So. 2d 884 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); see also Fla.R. of Crim.P. 3.702(c) (“Felony offenses not listed in section 921.0012 are to be assigned a severity level as described in section 921.0013”). In 1994, the legislature amended section 921.0012 and provided that th…
• Ladawn Gibson v. State, 691 So. 2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997)
  …ifically listed in section 921.0012 the severity level for this crime should have been assigned pursuant to section 921.0013. This offense should have been assigned a severity ranking of level four pursuant to section 921.0013(2). Newberry v. State, 677 So. 2d 884 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Jenkins v. State, 661 So. 2d 411 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). The effect of this error resulted in assessing seventy-four points instead of twenty-two points on appellant’s scoresheet. We, accordingly, affirm the order revoking the app…
• Holt v. State, 781 So. 2d 498 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)
  …d scoresheet, his guideline range would be 25.8 to 43 months’ incarceration. In denying the rule 3.800(a) motion, the trial court held that the primary offense of aggravated child abuse was properly scored at level 8. However, in Newberry v. State, 677 So. 2d 884 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996), this court vacated a sentence imposed for aggravated child abuse because the conviction was erroneously scored as a level 8 offense when it should have been scored as a level 4 offense. Like Holt, the defendant in Newberry had b…