JOHN NEWBERRY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the sentence imposed exceeded the permissible guidelines range due to an improperly scored offense level.
Newberry pleaded guilty to aggravated child abuse, and received a sentence based on a Level 8 offense score. Both parties were apparently unaware the …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Plea Bargaining cases and more on FLexlaw
[*885] W. SHARP, Judge.
Newberry argues on appeal that the sentence he received after pleading guilty to aggravated child abuse,1 exceeded the permissible guidelines range, because his crime was scored as a level 8 offense. He was given a total sentencing score of 74, and sentenced to five years in the state prison. We agree reversible error occurred in this case and remand for resentencing with a proper scoresheet.
The state argues that the sentence should be sustained because it was part of a plea bargain, for which the state dropped a second count. If Newberry had been convicted of both crimes, based on a scoresheet which would have included both crimes, the score would have permitted the sentence which is being appealed (eleven years). However, the plea bargain in this case lacked any agreement about the length of sentence.
Apparently, both Newberry and the State were unaware that the crime to which he pled guilty was only a Level 4 offense. If scored properly, Newberry’s scoresheet for that crime should only have been 40.2 points. At that level, the trial court’s decision to incarcerate him or not is discretionary, not mandatory, and the maximum sentence permitted (absent a departure sentence) is 15.25 months. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.990.
It is significant that Newberry is not trying to withdraw his guilty plea. The record clearly shows that Newberry pled guilty to a Level four offense only, and the state agreed under those circumstances to drop the other criminal charge against him. A deal is a deal, even though it is a bad one for the state.
REVERSED and REMANDED for resentencing.
PETERSON, C.J., and GOSHORN, J., concur. . § 827.03(b) and (c), Fla. Stat. (1993).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ducharme v. State, 690 So. 2d 1358 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997)…(c), or (d) would require a level 4 ranking mandating the assessment of 22 points consistent with a felony of the second degree. See §§ 921.0013(2) and 921.0014(1); Jenkins v. State, 661 So. 2d 411, 412 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); accord Newberry v. State, 677 So. 2d 884 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); see also Fla.R. of Crim.P. 3.702(c) (“Felony offenses not listed in section 921.0012 are to be assigned a severity level as described in section 921.0013”). In 1994, the legislature amended section 921.0012 and provided that th…
-
Ladawn Gibson v. State, 691 So. 2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997)…ifically listed in section 921.0012 the severity level for this crime should have been assigned pursuant to section 921.0013. This offense should have been assigned a severity ranking of level four pursuant to section 921.0013(2). Newberry v. State, 677 So. 2d 884 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Jenkins v. State, 661 So. 2d 411 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). The effect of this error resulted in assessing seventy-four points instead of twenty-two points on appellant’s scoresheet. We, accordingly, affirm the order revoking the app…
-
Holt v. State, 781 So. 2d 498 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)…d scoresheet, his guideline range would be 25.8 to 43 months’ incarceration. In denying the rule 3.800(a) motion, the trial court held that the primary offense of aggravated child abuse was properly scored at level 8. However, in Newberry v. State, 677 So. 2d 884 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996), this court vacated a sentence imposed for aggravated child abuse because the conviction was erroneously scored as a level 8 offense when it should have been scored as a level 4 offense. Like Holt, the defendant in Newberry had b…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence