MARY EMILY WALKER, APPELLANT,
v.
MAUDE MATHIS, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1996-07-17
No. 96-63
Before BARKDULL, COPE and LEVY, JJ.
678 So. 2d 2 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1996) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

[*3] PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Parrish v. Matthews, 548 So. 2d 725 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Echazabal v. El Toro Meat Packing Corp., 506 So. 2d 1100 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), cause dismissed, 511 So. 2d 998 (Fla.1987); McCarty v. Dade Division of American Hospital Supply, 360 So. 2d 436 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Houston v. Palm BAY Condo., Inc., 63 So. 3d 864 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Quintero v. Golfview Club, 929 So. 2d 666 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); Walker v. Mathis, 678 So. 2d 2 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Echazabal v. El Toro Meat Packing Corp., 506 So. 2d 1100 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); see also McCarty v. Dade Division of American Hospital Supply, 360 So. 2d 436 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw