FRANCIS X. WAREHAM, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
[*433] GRIFFIN, Judge.
In these two cases, which we consolidate and consider together, defendant appeals the summary denial of his third and his fourth1 Rule 3.800(a) motions to correct sentences he received for burglary, after violation of probation, and for manslaughter. The trial court correctly ruled that these motions are frivolous and constitute an abuse of the court’s process. There is no need to indulge such filings until their number approaches a dozen. Accordingly, we order that appellant shall not be permitted to file any further pro se attacks upon his 1989 judgment and sentences.
AFFIRMED with directions.
GOSHORN and ANTOON, JJ., concur. . It is denominated a "supplement.”
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Spencer v. State, 717 So. 2d 95 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)…So. 2d 1216 (Fla.1995); Attwood v. Eighth Circuit Court, 667 So. 2d 356 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). Such a sanction can be imposed at the trial level as well as the appellate level. See Bivens v. State, 715 So. 2d 261 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); Wareham v. State, 678 So. 2d 432 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 686 So. 2d 583 (Fla.1996). In Martin v. Circuit Court, Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 627 So. 2d 1298 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993), where the chief judge of a circuit court issued an administrative order prohibiting a pro se liti…
-
Hall v. State, 744 So. 2d 517 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)…nt evidence to find that Hall and Foster had violated their probation. The law is clear that a person’s probation cannot be revoked solely on the basis of hearsay evidence. See Shaw v. State, 710 So. 2d 182 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); [*521] Ford v. State, 678 So. 2d 432 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Colina v. State, 629 So. 2d 274 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Lira v. State, 579 So. 2d 781 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). In this case, the State introduced an overwhelming amount of hearsay evidence. It argues that enough non-hearsay evidence was…1 / 2
-
Nanivette Rodriguez v. State, 768 So. 2d 1234 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000)…e conditions of her probation. REVERSED. THOMPSON, C.J., and COBB, J., concur. . § 817.61 (Fla.Stat.1997). . Purvis v. State, 397 So. 2d 746 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). See also Anderson v. State, 711 So. 2d 106, 108 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Ford v. State, 678 So. 2d 432 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Garcia v. State, 701 So. 2d 607, 609 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence