WILLIE MITCHELL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Willie Mitchell appeals his conviction and sentence for attempted armed burglary of a dwelling. The court affirms his conviction but reverses his sentence as a habitual violent felony offender because the trial court failed to establish that his prior 1992 felony conviction was one of the enumerated violent felonies required by statute.
The court affirms Mitchell's conviction for attempted armed burglary but reverses the habitual violent felony offender sentence because the trial court failed to find by a preponderance of the evidence that the 1992 prior conviction was one of the enumerated violent felonies required by section 775.084(1)(b). The case is remanded to allow the state to prove Mitchell meets the requirements for habitual offender sentencing.
[1] A trial court must find by a preponderance of the evidence each factor necessary to impose a habitual felony offender sentence.
[2] A prior felony conviction must be one of the enumerated violent felonies to qualify a defendant for habitual violent felony offender sentencing.
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Section 775.084(3)(d), Florida Statutes (1993) requires the trial court to find by a preponderance of the evidence each factor necessary to impose a habitual felony offender sentence pursuant to section 775.084(l)(a) or a habitual violent felony offender sentence pursuant to section 775.084(l)(b).”
Establishes the statutory burden of proof required for habitual violent felony offender sentencing
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceMitchell was convicted of attempted armed burglary of a dwelling. At sentencing, the trial court took judicial notice of three prior felony conviction…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Habitual Violent Felony Offender cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Willie Mitchell appeals his conviction and sentence for attempted armed burglary of a dwelling. We affirm appellant’s conviction and reverse his sentence as a habitual violent felony offender. The state sought to have appellant adjudicated as a habitual violent felony offender. At the sentencing hearing, the trial court took judicial notice of original judgments and sentences for appellant in three felony cases: two 1987 cases and one 1992 case. The state’s expert testified that the fingerprints in those cases matched appellant’s fingerprints. Appellant’s counsel objected, arguing only that appellant’s record did not qualify him as a violent offender. The trial court sentenced appellant as a habitual violent offender resulting in a sentence of thirty years’ imprisonment without eligibility for release for ten years.
Section 775.084(3)(d), Florida Statutes (1993) requires the trial court to find by a preponderance of the evidence each factor necessary to impose a habitual felony offender sentence pursuant to section 775.084(l)(a) or a habitual violent felony offender sentence pursuant to section 775.084(l)(b). The record demonstrates that appellant had a prior felony conviction within five years of the commission of the instant offense as required by section 775.084(l)(b)2. The record does not show nor did the trial court find that the prior 1992 felony was one of the enumerated felonies necessary to classify appellant as a habitual violent felony offender.1
Accordingly, we reverse appellant’s sentence as a habitual violent felony offender. Since the record does not disclose the nature of the 1992 conviction and appellant did not object to the prior convictions at the time he was sentenced, we remand with leave to the state to prove that appellant meets the requirements for habitual offender sentencing. Ford v. State, 592 So. 2d 348 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Davis v. State, 588 So. 2d 289 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).
AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED.
DELL and PARIENTE, JJ., and MAY, Melanie G., Associate Judge, concur. . Section 775.084(l)(b)l lists the enumerated felonies as arson, sexual battery, robbery, kidnapping, aggravated child abuse, aggravated assault, murder, manslaughter, unlawful throwing, placing, or discharging of a destructive device or bomb, armed burglary or aggravated battery.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- N.E.R. v. State, 588 So. 2d 289 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)
- Ford v. State, 592 So. 2d 348 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)