WILLIAM O'NEAL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's refusal to give a requested jury instruction on a permissive lesser included offense constitutes reversible error when the pleadings and evidence support such an instruction.
Appellant was convicted of lewd assault on a child under sixteen. At the charge conference, the trial court denied appellant's request for a jury inst…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Accusatory Pleading cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
In this cause appellant raises two issues, the first regarding the admission of hearsay evidence and the second arguing that the trial court erred in denying appellant’s request that the standard jury instruction on a lesser included offense be given. Because we reverse on the second issue and remand for new trial, we do not address the first issue.
Appellant was convicted as charged of lewd assault on a child under sixteen and was sentenced to three years in prison followed by twelve years’ probation. At the charge conference, appellant’s counsel requested that the court give the standard jury instruction on simple battery, a permissive lesser included offense to the charged crime. Stating that the request was untimely because it had not been submitted pre-trial and that the court was not required to give the instruction because battery is not a necessary lesser included offense, the trial court refused to give the requested instruction.
The determination of whether an instruction on a permissive lesser included offense should be given cannot be made by the trial court without considering the accusatory pleading and the supporting evidence at trial. See State v. Wimberly, 498 So. 2d 929, 931 (Fla.1986). It is well-settled that “[a]n instruction on a permissive lesser included offense must be given ‘when the pleadings and the evidence demonstrate that the lesser offense is included in the offense charged.’ ” Amado v. State, 585 So. 2d 282 (Fla.1991). In the instant case, appellant was entitled to the requested instruction, and the court’s failure to give the instruction is reversible error. Gainer v. State, 633 So. 2d 480, 481 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). The cause is remanded for new trial.
MINER and LAWRENCE, JJ., and SMITH, Senior Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hall v. Hall, 721 So. 2d 446 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)…judgment directs the former husband to “maintain the existing life insurance policy on his life naming the [former wife] as irrevocable beneficiary so long as he has an obligation of support to her or their minor daughter.” In McGinley v. McGinley, 678 So. 2d 922 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996), we held that such a provision constitutes reversible eiTor. The former wife concedes as much. Accordingly, as in McGinley, we reverse and remand with directions that the trial court identify the beneficiaries for child support a…
-
Gordon v. Gordon, 63 So. 3d 824 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011)…rthermore, as acknowledged by both parties, the trial court erred in failing to allocate the amount of life insurance designated to secure the alimony award vis-a-vis the amount designated to secure the child support award. See McGinley v. McGinley, 678 So. 2d 922 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). Additionally, the life insurance securing the child support award shall be designated as being for the benefit of the children. Layeni v. Layeni, 843 So. 2d 295, 300 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003). The husband also appeals the trial court…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Wimberly, 498 So. 2d 929 (Fla. 1986)
- Amado v. State, 585 So. 2d 282 (Fla. 1991)
- Schwartz Monzell Gainer v. State, 633 So. 2d 480 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)