JEAN ALFRED, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• State v. Meeks, 789 So. 2d 982 (Fla. 2001)
  …la. 2d DCA 2000); Escutary v. State, 753 So. 2d 650 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Johnson v. State, 736 So. 2d 708 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); Robinson v. State, 702 So. 2d 1346 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); Hill v. State, 692 So. 2d 277 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); Johnson v. State, 678 So. 2d 934 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Dunbar v. State, 664 So. 2d 1093 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Reeves v. State, 605 So. 2d 562 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). While no Florida decision until Meeks had undertaken the task of specifically defining “substantive” or “technical/nonsubsta…
• Christian v. State, 84 So. 3d 437 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012)
  …in 1992, dealt with the pre-1990 version of the Youthful Offender Act (before the Act was amended to provide for sentencing above the six-year cap following a substantive violation of youthful offender probation). See id.; see also Johnson v. State, 678 So. 2d 934 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). So, the practical effect of the ruling was that the defendant in that case could not be sentenced above the six-year cap. But, even as of the date that Amette was decided, the Youthful Offender Act had already been amended to pro…
• Treymone Goldwire v. State, 73 So. 3d 844 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)
  …offender sentence.” Willis v. State, 744 So. 2d 1265, 1266 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (citing Hill v. State, 692 So. 2d 277, 278 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997) (stating that a trial court is permitted to exceed youthful offender maximum sentences); Johnson v. State, 678 So. 2d 934, 934-35 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (providing that a youthful offender may be sentenced as a non-youthful offender for commission of a substantive violation while on probation); Dunbar v. State, 664 So. 2d 1093, 1094 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)). Accordingly, it is…

Authorities Cited

• Stripling v. State, 645 So. 2d 589 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)