CYNTHIA DAWSON-KNAPP, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Tolling Of Appeal Time cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The defendant challenges an order rendered August 26, 1994, denying a motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. The defendant filed a motion for rehearing on September 12, 1994, which was denied by order entered October 19, 1994. Because a motion for rehearing is not authorized by Rule 3.800, the time for filing a notice of appeal was not tolled. Further, the trial court’s erroneous recital that the defendant had “thirty (30) days from the date of [the order denying rehearing] to appeal” did not toll the time for filing a notice of appeal. See Jones v. State, 635 So. 2d 989 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). Therefore, this appeal is untimely and must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and BLUE and FULMER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (20 total)
-
Dep't OF Revenue v. Jackson, 846 So. 2d 486 (Fla. 2003)…to a father who was scheduled for sentencing on federal criminal charges, where there- was “no showing that the husband had the capability while he was in prison to earn the amount imputed to him.” Pickett, 709 So. 2d at 183 (quoting Waugh v. Waugh, 679 So. 2d 1, 3 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996)). The court in Pickett remanded the case to the trial court for consideration under the principles enunciated by the Second District in its Waugh decision. See id. In Waugh, the Second District reversed the terms of an origina…1 / 2
-
Mascola v. Lusskin, 727 So. 2d 328 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)…that basis an amount of support as if the parent were in fact earning the income so imputed. Hayden v. Hayden, 662 So. 2d 713, 716 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). The pertinent cases are Pickett v. Pickett, 709 So. 2d 182 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Waugh v. Waugh, 679 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); and Waskin v. Waskin, 484 So. 2d 1277 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986), rev denied, 494 So. 2d 1153 (Fla.1986). The second district in Waugh concluded that it was error to impute pre- [*330] incarceration income to the obligor unless there was…
-
Johnson v. Shakira Johnson, 992 So. 2d 399 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008)…present his version of the facts. In other words, the prisoner must bring to the court’s attention his desire to appear personally or telephoni-cally at hearing or trial. When the issue is preserved, however, the right is clear. See Waugh v. Waugh, 679 So. 2d 1, 2 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996) (holding trial court denied incarcerated husband due process by conducting final dissolution hearing in husband’s absence where husband had filed motions for transport and to testify at hearing); McGlamry v. McGlamry, 608 So. 2…
Previewing 3 of 20 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Jones v. State, 635 So. 2d 989 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)