B.L., A CHILD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
B.L., A CHILD, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
679 So. 2d 878
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1996)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm B.L.’s adjudication and disposition. However, in so doing, we strike the imposition of the public defender’s fee because the court failed to apprise the juvenile or his parents of their right to contest the amount as required by rule 3.720(d)(1), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. On remand, the fee may be reimposed upon compliance with the rule. See, e.g., Green v. State, 650 So. 2d 635 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).
AFFIRMED in part; REMANDED.
PETERSON, C.J., and DAUKSCH and GOSHORN, JJ., concur. . See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
M.K.L. v. State, 686 So. 2d 793 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)…he court faded to apprise the juvenile or his parents of their right to contest the amount as required by Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.720(d)(1),. On remand, the fee may be reimposed upon compliance with the rule. See, e.ff., B.L. v. State, 679 So. 2d 878 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); M.T.C. v. State, 679 So. 2d 67 [*794] (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Green v. State, 650 So. 2d 635 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). AFFIRMED in part; REMANDED. DAUKSCH, W. SHARP and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur. . See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 7…
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- Green v. State, 650 So. 2d 635 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)
- Olson v. Potter, 650 So. 2d 635 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)