ANTONIO CONCEPCION, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ANTONIO CONCEPCION, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
679 So. 2d 891
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1996)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See United States v. Hiett, 581 F. 2d 1199 (5th Cir.1978); Riechmann v. State, 581 So. 2d 133 (Fla.1991), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 952, 113 S.Ct. 405, 121 L.Ed.2d 331 (1992); Valdez v. State, 585 So. 2d 479 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Gosha v. State, 534 So. 2d 912 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Murvin v. State, 371 So. 2d 1062 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- United States v. Hiett, 581 F.2d 1199 (5th Cir. 1978)
- Dieter Riechmann v. State, 581 So. 2d 133 (Fla. 1991)
- Gosha v. State, 534 So. 2d 912 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)
- In re Ziegler, 506 U.S. 952 (U.S. 1992)
- Avirgan v. Hull, 506 U.S. 952 (U.S. 1992)
- Valdez v. State, 585 So. 2d 479 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)
- Charity Ann Murvin v. State, 371 So. 2d 1062 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)