THOMAS KENT, SHANDS HOWARD, LAWRENCE R. DUMAS, JAMES H. BARTON, HOWARD C. ADKINS, DANIEL HARRISON AND MARK FICKEN, APPELLANTS,
v.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1996-03-27
No. 95-3577
BARFIELD, ALLEN and DAVIS, JJ., concur.
680 So. 2d 490 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1996) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Heifetz v. Dep’t. of Business Regulation, 475 So. 2d 1277, 1281-82 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).

BARFIELD, ALLEN and DAVIS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Montemus Jenkins, II v. State, 691 So. 2d 41 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)
    …hich terms of probation appellant violated. Because we cannot determine from the record whether the trial court would have revoked probation based solely on the remaining valid violations, we REVERSE and REMAND for reconsideration. Daniels v. State, 680 So. 2d 490 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Gavins v. State, 587 So. 2d 487 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). MINER, ALLEN and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.…
  • Dixon v. State, 789 So. 2d 522 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)
    …e Department of Corrections, based on the battery charge alone. Accordingly, we reverse the revocation order and remand the case to the trial court for further consideration. See Jenkins v. State, 691 So. 2d 41 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); Daniels v. State, 680 So. 2d 490 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). BOOTH, KAHN and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw