ADRIAN FALCONSAPP, A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH HIS PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN, WILLIAM DONALD FALCONSAPP, AND WILLIAM DONALD FALCONSAPP, INDIVIDUALLY, APPELLANTS,
v.
SPINNAKER III OF PANAMA CITY BEACH, INC., AND SOUP DRAGONS, INC., APPELLEES
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Summary Judgment Standard cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Adrian Falconsapp, plaintiff below, appeals a final summary judgment entered in favor of the defendant, Spinnaker III of Panama City Beach, Incorporated, in a negligence case arising out of injuries he incurred while on the premises of a beach club operated by Spinnaker. We reverse.
A party moving for summary judgment must conclusively show the nonexistence of any question of material fact, and the trial court must draw all possible inferences in favor of the party against whom summary judgment is sought. Chelton v. Tallahassee-Leon County Civic Ctr. Auth., 525 So. 2d 972, 974 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 534 So. 2d 402 (Fla.1988). Because our review of the record reveals the presence of multiple issues of material fact, Spinnaker is not entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Maldonado v. Jack M. Berry Grove Corp., 351 So. 2d 967 (Fla.1977). Accordingly, we REVERSE the trial court’s order granting summary judgment and REMAND for further proceedings.
MINER, MICKLE and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Doerr v. Doerr, 751 So. 2d 154 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)…to continue to contribute to those funds. Even though the husband abandoned his challenge directed toward the designation of the funds as marital assets and their distribution, upon remand we direct the trial court’s attention to Osborne v. Osborne, 680 So. 2d 505 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996), and Walton v. Walton, 657 So. 2d 1214 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), for guidance in distributing these funds. We affirm the trial court’s determination of alimony and the award of primary residential care of the minor children. We, howe…
-
Tate v. Tate, 91 So. 3d 199 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012)…to be the custodian of the funds, the conditions under which the custodian will hold the funds, and the question of liability for continuing the payments into the funds. See Doerr v. Doerr, 751 So. 2d 154, 156 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Osborne v. Osborne, 680 So. 2d 505, 506 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Walton v. Walton, 657 So. 2d 1214, 1217 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). V. CONCLUSION We reverse the provision in the amended final judgment requiring the Wife to pay the expenses of the condominium pending its sale without contribu…
Authorities Cited
- Maldonado v. Jack M. Berry Grove Corp., 351 So. 2d 967 (Fla. 1977)
- Chelton v. Tallahassee-Leon Cnty. Civic Ctr. Auth., 525 So. 2d 972 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)