JIM O. STRICKLAND, APPELLANT,
v.
TRACY S. STRICKLAND, APPELLEE
JIM O. STRICKLAND, APPELLANT,
TRACY S. STRICKLAND, APPELLEE
680 So. 2d 612
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1996)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Jim 0. Strickland raises several issues in this appeal of an order modifying a final judgment of dissolution. Tracy S. Strickland, appellee, concedes that the lower court erred in its calculations when it divided the guidelines child support amount between the parties. Further, remand is also necessary for the lower court to make findings of fact to support its decision to impute income to the appellant for the purpose of establishing the award of child support under the guidelines. See, Nunez v. Nunez, 646 So. 2d 290 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). We find the remaining issues raised by appellant to be without merit.
REVERSED and REMANDED for entry of a corrected opinion.
BOOTH, JOANOS and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jyhno Rock v. State, 749 So. 2d 566 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)…ld have been granted and that the evidence was legally insufficient to support the probation revocation. We conclude that under the totality of the circumstances, the court was entirely correct in denying the motion to suppress. See Dyer v. State, 680 So. 2d 612 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); S.P.L. v. State, 512 So. 2d 1153 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Cobb v. State, 511 So. 2d 698 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). Second, “[t]he evidence for revocation ... need only be sufficient to satisfy the conscience of the court that the violatio…
Authorities Cited
- Nunez v. Nunez, 646 So. 2d 290 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)