W. J. S. CARR AND R. F. BEVAN, APPELLANTS,
v.
ELDRIDGE HART AND MOTORS FINANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION, APPELLEES

Fla. | 1931-01-07
Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.
100 Fla. 1631 Florida Supreme Court (1931) Caution
Also reported at: 131 So. 777
Cited by 22 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the réspective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Cent. Truck Lines, Inc. v. R.R. Comm'n & St. Johns River Line Co., 118 Fla. 555 (Fla. 1935)
    …Lines v. Railroad Commissioners, 100 Fla. [*565] 538, 129 Sou. Rep. 876; In re: Harold R. Edwards Application, 100 Fla. 989, 130 Sou. Rep. 615; Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. Wells, 100 Fla. 1027, 130 Sou. Rep. 587; Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. Wells, 100 Fla. 1631, 131 Sou. Rep. 777; Florida Motor Lines v. Railroad Commissioners, 101 Fla. 1018, 132 Sou. Rep. 851. Chapter 14764, Acts 1931, was a complete revision and re-enactment of the provisions of Chapter 13700, supra, which it superseded, but all rights .…
  • Fla. Motor Lines Corp. v. Douglass, 150 Fla. 1 (Fla. 1941)
    …quired by the Commission.” We think it is not necessary for us here to reiterate what we have said in Florida Motor Lines v. Railroad Commission, 100 Fla. 538, 129 Sou. 876; S.A.L. Ry. Co. v. Wells, 100 Fla. 1027, 130 Sou. 587; S.A.L. Ry. v. Wells, 100 Fla. 1631, 131 So. 777; Central Truck Lines, Inc., v. Fla. State R.R. Commission, 146 Fla. 521, 1 Sou. (2nd) 470; Central Truck Lines v. Fla. R.R. Commission, 118 Fla. 555, 160 Sou. 26. The operation under the order will require a duplication of service over…
  • S. Armored Serv., Inc. v. Mason, 167 So. 2d 848 (Fla. 1964)
    …es, to have two competing services. We think of no circumstance in which it would not be desirable and convenient to have more than one carrier serve [*852] an area, but as this Court observed in Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Wells, 1931, 100 Fla. 1631, 131 So. 777, it is not enough to show that another competing carrier will serve the convenience of some individuals. There must be a showing of reasonable necessity also. It is the policy of the law to avoid duplication of services unless it be affirmatively s…

Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw