DONALD BAKER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
DONALD BAKER, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
680 So. 2d 635
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1996)
Caution
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Williams v. State, 674 So. 2d 155 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).
DELL, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sheffield v. State, 214 So. 3d 763 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017)…nes and cannot include that offense either as a primary or additional offense on the guidelines score-sheet. See Olsen v. State, 791 So. 2d 558, 560 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Drayton v. State, 744 So. 2d 584, 585-86 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); Alexander v. State, 680 So. 2d 635 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Byrd v. State, 643 So. 2d 1209 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Eaddy v. State, 626 So. 2d 291 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Ricardo v. State, 608 So. 2d 93, 94-95 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Silliker v. State, 598 So. 2d 133, 134 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992); Wyche…
-
Hunter v. State, 732 So. 2d 10 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)…conviction or as an additional offense at conviction, where a trial court in a simultaneous sentencing imposes habitual offender dispositions on some counts but guidelines dispositions on other counts. See id. at 94-95; see also Alexander v. State, 680 So. 2d 635 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Chapman v. State, 672 So. 2d 637 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Eaddy v. State, 626 So. 2d 291 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993).* The logic of Ricardo is apparently that it would unfairly increase the permitted sentence for the guidelines sentences if…
Authorities Cited
- Williams v. State, 674 So. 2d 155 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)