OSCAR MASSEY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
OSCAR MASSEY, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
680 So. 2d 635
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1996)
Caution
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the sentence, finding no merit in appellant’s argument that the state violated its plea agreement. We remand, however, because although the trial court orally pronounced a sentence of 41 months and adjudicated appellant a youthful offender, the written sentence failed to reflect this oral pronouncement. The state concedes that remand is necessary to correct the written sentence.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REMANDED FOR CORRECTION OF WRITTEN SENTENCE.
WARNER, PARIENTE and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sheffield v. State, 214 So. 3d 763 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017)…nes and cannot include that offense either as a primary or additional offense on the guidelines score-sheet. See Olsen v. State, 791 So. 2d 558, 560 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Drayton v. State, 744 So. 2d 584, 585-86 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); Alexander v. State, 680 So. 2d 635 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Byrd v. State, 643 So. 2d 1209 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Eaddy v. State, 626 So. 2d 291 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Ricardo v. State, 608 So. 2d 93, 94-95 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Silliker v. State, 598 So. 2d 133, 134 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992); Wyche…
-
Hunter v. State, 732 So. 2d 10 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)…conviction or as an additional offense at conviction, where a trial court in a simultaneous sentencing imposes habitual offender dispositions on some counts but guidelines dispositions on other counts. See id. at 94-95; see also Alexander v. State, 680 So. 2d 635 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Chapman v. State, 672 So. 2d 637 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Eaddy v. State, 626 So. 2d 291 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993).* The logic of Ricardo is apparently that it would unfairly increase the permitted sentence for the guidelines sentences if…