EDWARD E. SMITH, APPELLANT,
v.
THE SCHOOL BOARD OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1996-08-14
No. 95-2983
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GERSTEN and GODERICH, JJ.
680 So. 2d 1040 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1996) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We find that the School Board of Dade County properly fulfilled the requirements as prescribed by section 120.57(l)(b)(10), Florida Statutes (1995). Allen v. School Bd. of Dade Co., 571 So. 2d 568, 569 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) (“The School Board is allowed to increase the penalty recommended by the hearing officer provided that it reviews the complete record and states with particularity its reasons for increasing the penalty.”).

Accordingly, we affirm.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Johnson v. The Sch. Bd. OF Dade Cnty., 682 So. 2d 594 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Smith v. School Bd. of Dade Co., 680 So. 2d 1040 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Pesetsky v. School Bd. of Dade Co., 608 So. 2d 581 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Allen v. School Bd. of Dade Co., 571 So. 2d 568, 569 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw