STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
ROBERT GAGNE, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Violation Of Injunction cases and more on FLexlaw
PARIENTE, Judge.
On the authority of State v. Johnson, 676 So. 2d 408 (Fla.1996), we reverse the trial court’s order which dismissed the information filed against appellant for aggravated stalking. In Johnson, our supreme court held that double jeopardy does not bar a subsequent prosecution for aggravated stalking where the defendant had previously been convicted for violating an injunction based on the same conduct. See also Williams v. State, 673 So. 2d 486 (Fla.1996). The trial court did not have the benefit of the supreme court’s decision in Johnson when it made the determination that the prosecution for aggravated stalking was barred on double jeopardy grounds based on the prior dismissal of the contempt proceedings for violation of an injunction arising from the same conduct.
GUNTHER, C.J., and STONE, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Holland v. State, 696 So. 2d 757 (Fla. 1997)…HARDING, Justice. We have for review State v. Holland, 680 So. 2d 1041, 1044 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996), in which the First District Court of Appeal [*758] certified the following question to be of great public importance: WHETHER WHREN V UNITED STATES, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 1769, 135 L.Ed.2d 89 (1996), OVERRULES STATE V. DANI…1 / 2
-
Saturnino-Boudet v. State, 682 So. 2d 188 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)…y altered by Whren v. United States, -U.S.-, 116 S.Ct. 1769, 135 L.Ed.2d 89 (1996) (validating traffic stops where the officer has probable cause to believe that any traffic violation has been committed). Art. I, § 12, Fla. Const.; State v. Holland, 680 So. 2d 1041 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); State v. Corvin, 677 So. 2d 947 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Indialantic Police Dep’t v. Zimmerman, 677 So. 2d 1307 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Petrel v. State, 675 So. 2d 1049 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). Whren does not control Boudet's case, however,…
-
State v. Kindle, 782 So. 2d 971 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)…tics seized incident to that search will generally be shielded from suppression. See Gomez v. State, 748 So. 2d 352 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999), rev. dismissed, 762 So. 2d 916 (Fla.2000); State v. Parrish, 731 So. 2d 101 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); State v. Holland, 680 So. 2d 1041 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); State v. Cromatie, 668 So. 2d 1075 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); see also Castro v. State, 755 So. 2d 657 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). But if the stop is illegal, consent to search thereafter given is generally considered invalid. See, e.g., Croo…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- State v. Johnson, 676 So. 2d 408 (Fla. 1996)
- Williams v. State, 673 So. 2d 486 (Fla. 1996)