PAUL MATHIS, APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE,

v.

BE & K CONSTRUCTION/ST. PAUL INSURANCE CO., APPELLEES/CROSS-APPELLANTS

Citator

Cited By

• Miller v. Miller, 842 So. 2d 168 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)
  …is court has previously stated “[i]t is not our function to reweigh the evidence or to substitute our judgment for that of the trial court.” Cole Taylor Bank v. Shannon, 772 So. 2d 546, 552 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (quoting Smith v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 681 So. 2d 871 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)); Clegg v. Chipola Aviation, Inc., 458 So. 2d 1186, 1187 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). The appellate court merely determines whether the trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial competent evidence. Cole Taylor Bank, 772 So. 2d a…
• Cole Taylor Bank v. Shannon, 772 So. 2d 546 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)
  …al findings of the trial court, especially where factual conflicts must be resolved, will not be set aside on appellate review unless those findings are unsupported by competent and substantial evidence in the record. Smith v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 681 So. 2d 871 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) (citation omitted). Although there is circumstantial evidence in the record from which the trial court might have inferred knowledge on the part of Patricia Shannon, we find competent, substantial evidence to support the trial c…
• Young v. Dep't of Educ., 943 So. 2d 901 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)
  …te and weigh the testimony and other evidence submitted at the hearing to resolve factual conflicts, and to arrive at findings of fact. It is not the role of the appellate court to reweigh the evidence anew. See Smith v. [*903] Sears, Roebuck & Co., 681 So. 2d 871 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). Our review of the record indicates that the findings of fact are supported by competent and substantial evidence. Further, we hold that the judge’s conclusions of law are not erroneous. Accordingly, the final order is AFFIRMED.…

Authorities Cited

• Davis v. Bonded Transp., Inc., 573 So. 2d 373 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)