ARNETT FRAZIER PIERCE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1996-10-22
No. 95-2393
MINER, ALLEN and MICKLE, JJ., concur.
681 So. 2d 873 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1996)


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, the appellant challenges convictions and sentences imposed for various offenses, including three counts of resisting an officer with violence as proscribed by section 843.01, Florida Statutes. Because this statute refers to “any” officer, and the three counts in the present case are predicated on one incident during which the appellant resisted or opposed three officers, only one conviction is permitted in connection with this single episode. See State v. Watts, 462 So. 2d 813 (Fla.1985). Two of these convictions are therefore reversed and, as it appears that this will alter the presumptive sentencing range under the Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.702 guidelines, all of the appellant’s sentences are vacated and the case is remanded for resentencing upon a corrected guidelines scoresheet. E.g. Stepps v. State, 675 So. 2d 1008 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). The other convictions are affirmed.

MINER, ALLEN and MICKLE, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw