HUMBERTO GOMEZ, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1996-10-30
No. 95-3144
Before GERSTEN, GODERICH and GREEN, JJ.
681 So. 2d 933 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1996)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing evidence of collateral sex crimes where both the charged offenses and the collateral crimes occurred in a familial setting and where the collateral crimes were sufficiently similar to the charged offenses. See Saffor v. State, 660 So. 2d 668, 672 (Fla.1995); Shipman v. State, 668 So. 2d 313 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw