JOHN MCLAUGHLIN, A. J. GAINER, J. N. FAILE, B. A. RHODES AND FRANK G. MCGILL, AS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF BAY COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA EX REL. F. M. CAMPBELL, COUNTY JUDGE OF BAY COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR

Fla. | 1921-05-16
81 Fla. 741 Florida Supreme Court (1921) Caution
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment aforesaid, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having beeu seen and inspected, and' the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed'.

Browne, C. J., and Taylor, Ellis and West, J. J., concur. Whitfield, J., dissents.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • State v. Stinson, 114 Fla. 481 (Fla. 1934)
    …id by the county. Sections 6169, R. G. S., 8483, C. G. L., and 6170, R. G. S., 8484, C. G. L. Therefore, this case is' not controlled by the result which obtained in the case of State, ex rel. Campbell v. Board of County Commissioners of Bay County, 81 Fla. 741, 88 Sou. 704, or in Farrior v. Lancy, 100 Fla. 1141, 130 Sou. 715. The several statements, or bills, copies of which are above referred to, taken with all the allegations of the alternative writ are too vague, indefinite and uncertain to [*484] war…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw