JAMIE MANTEL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1996-10-30
No. 95-00407
PATTERSON, A.C.J., WHATLEY and PADGETT, JJ., and ROGERS, Associate J., concur.
682 So. 2d 613 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1996) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellate counsel for Jamie Mantel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), suggesting three issues for review. Our independent review of the record reveals error only in the assessment of two costs. We affirm in all other respects.

Mantel was improperly ordered to pay $2 pursuant to section 943.25(13), Florida Statutes (1993). This cost is discretionary, and since the trial court failed to give Mantel notice of this cost, it must be stricken. See Reyes v. State, 655 So. 2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

Mantel was also improperly ordered to pay a “cost/fine” in the amount of $33.00. Because the order does not contain a reference to the statutory authority for this assessment, this cost must also be stricken. Reyes.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment and sentence and strike the above two costs.

PATTERSON, A.C.J., WHATLEY and PADGETT, JJ., and ROGERS, Associate J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Bailey v. Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs., 703 So. 2d 1224 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)
    …g out its promises. Their statements about what happened were actually agreed to by the representatives of the Department at the hearing. In my view, these circumstances established a valid ground for withdrawal of their consents. Cf. State v. Hale, 682 So. 2d 613 (Fla. 2d DGA 1996); Woods v. State, 600 So. 2d 27, 28 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Moore v. State, 489 So. 2d 1215 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986) (trial court must either follow plea bargain or give defendant an opportunity to withdraw his plea).…
  • Dozier v. State, 881 So. 2d 662 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)
    …four-year sentence. If there is no longer an agreement then there is no longer a valid downward departure reason under paragraph 921.0026(2)(e), Florida Statutes. The Second District has squarely addressed the issue now before us in State v. Hale, 682 So. 2d 613 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). The court said: The State and Hale had entered into a plea agreement that called for a downward departure from the sentencing guidelines; however, the court did not impose the agreed upon sentence and instead imposed a different…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw