PERCY D. PERRY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1996-11-06
No. 95-4233
DELL and SHAHOOD, JJ., and COLBATH, WALTER N., Jr., Associate Judge, concur.
682 So. 2d 676 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1996) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

On October 27, 1995, the trial court entered two conflicting orders relating to appellant’s restitution obligation. One order requires appellant to pay restitution to the victim in an amount to be determined. The other order states that restitution is not ordered and not applicable. We reverse the trial court’s imposition of restitution and remand the cause with instructions for the trial court to resolve the conflict. We affirm the trial court’s determination of credit for jail time served.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED.

DELL and SHAHOOD, JJ., and COLBATH, WALTER N., Jr., Associate Judge, concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Cassedy v. Merrill Lynch, 751 So. 2d 143 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)
    …arbitration panel’s denial of prevailing party attorney’s fees to appellee where parties had stipulated on record, during arbitration proceedings, that arbitrators would also determine issue of entitlement to attorney’s fees). Cf. Solomon v. Sirkus, 682 So. 2d 676, 676 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (reversing trial court’s denial of motion to vacate arbitration panel’s award of attorney’s fees because “[t]he record supports appellant’s argument that in the underlying arbitration proceedings the parties did not stipulat…
  • Charbonneau v. Morse Operations, Inc., 727 So. 2d 1017 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)
    …es of any kind shall be settled by arbitration. See id. Based on Turnberry, the court held that the parties’ actions did not constitute an express waiver of their right to have the court decide the issue of fees. See id.; see also Solomon v. Sirkus, 682 So. 2d 676 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)(in the absence of a stipulation to confer jurisdiction upon the arbitrator to decide the attorney’s fee issue, the arbitrator exceeded [*1021] his scope of authority under section 682.11, Florida Statutes). Like appellees in D.H…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw