PAUL L. THOMAS, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• G.S. v. State, 709 So. 2d 122 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)
  …olation of community control, the contempt procedure is authorized and stands separately from the violation procedures and remedies. The only apparent limitations imposed by the appellate courts deal with double jeopardy concerns. See N.T. v. State, 682 So. 2d 688 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). The juveniles in this case have not been charged with violating community control in addition to contempt of court proceedings for the same conduct. Thus, double jeopardy is not involved in these cases. We deny the petitions fo…
• Cote v. State, 760 So. 2d 162 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)
  …d. Consequently, Mr. Cote’s prosecution for both indirect criminal contempt in the juvenile division and a violation of community control in the felony division violated his constitutional guarantee against double jeopardy. See N.T. v. [*167] State, 682 So. 2d 688 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). I would reverse. . Worley is a case that addresses the subject matter jurisdiction of county and circuit courts over misdemeanors.…
• Cote v. State, 793 So. 2d 907 (Fla. 2001)
  …WELLS, C.J., dissenting. I dissent because I conclude that there is no conflict jurisdiction between this case and N.T. v. State, 682 So. 2d 688 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). As stated by the Second District Court of Appeal’s majority, this case arises out of a unique factual situation, which is not the same as the situation presented to the Fifth District in N.T.. In [*912] view of there being no co…

  ← 1 / 2 →

Authorities Cited

• M.K.L. v. State, 662 So. 2d 1348 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)