CARLOS RAMOS, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
CARLOS RAMOS, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
682 So. 2d 711
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1996)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Upon the State’s proper confession of error, we remand this cause for the trial court to clarify the written sentencing order under review to reflect that appellant’s four year sentence of imprisonment in case # 93-30249-B and five year sentence of imprisonment in case # 93-34786 are to run concurrent to his nine year sentence of imprisonment in case # 93-43229 in conformity with the court’s oral pronouncement in this regard.
Reversed and remanded with directions.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Mehboob Jivanjee v. State, 724 So. 2d 108 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)…t of sentence. See Tannehill v. State, 712 So. 2d 438 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Denson v. State, 711 So. 2d 1225 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); Murguia v. State, 711 So. 2d 185 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Alvarez v. State, 698 So. 2d 1377 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Ramos v. State, 682 So. 2d 711 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). Accordingly, defendant’s conviction is affirmed, defendant’s sentence is vacated and the case remanded with directions to correct the written sentencing order to reflect a sentence of 30 years imprisonment with a 15-year mandat…
-
Burton v. State, 695 So. 2d 851 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Quarterman v. State, 527 So. 2d 1380 (Fla.1988); Taylor v. State, 682 So. 2d 711 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996).…