CARLTON TAYLOR, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Adekunle v. State, 916 So. 2d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)
  …ion. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(17). The 1997 cases should have been scored as “prior record” in the 1998 scoresheet. We reverse and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion and resentenc-ing if necessary. See also Williamson v. State, 683 So. 2d 193, 194 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) (holding that original scoresheet should have been used following VOP not a consolidated scoresheet which included a subsequent offense). Reversed and Remanded. FARMER, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.…
• Mooney v. State, 864 So. 2d 60 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)
  …Here, the sentence imposed by the trial court was not illegal. Despite the fact that the sentence imposed by the trial court was not illegal, a rule 3.800 motion is also a proper vehicle to raise a scoresheet miscalculation. See Williamson v. State, 683 So. 2d 193, 193-94 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) (stating that “[although the appellant has not alleged that he received an ‘illegal sentence,’ ... his claim is nevertheless cognizable under rule 3.800(a) because he has asserted a scoresheet miscalculation which is appa…
• United States v. Hernandez-Martinez, 382 F.3d 1304 (11th Cir. 2004)
  …plan. . Under Florida law, sentences are consolidated when they are imposed on the same day, by the same judge, using the same score sheet, and made to run concurrently. See Clark v. Florida, 572 So. 2d 1387, 1391 (Fla.1991); Williamson v. Florida, 683 So. 2d 193, 194 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1996). Moreover, the state court is required to use one score sheet for all offenses "pending” before the court at sentencing. Clark, 572 So. 2d at 1390-91. "Pending” refers to those offenses for which a verdict of guilty or a…

Authorities Cited

• Wright v. State, 223 So. 2d 112 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969)
• Webb v. State, 62 So. 2d 410 (Fla. 1953)