DARREN WASHINGTON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1996-11-27
No. 96-3433
GLICKSTEIN, WARNER and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.
683 So. 2d 215 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1996) Positive Treatment
Cited by 18 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This court affirms the order denying appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief without prejudice to appellant seeking mandamus relief in the circuit court if the Department of Corrections fails to restore incentive gain time in accordance with Gwong v. Singletary, 683 So. 2d 109 (Fla.1996).

GLICKSTEIN, WARNER and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (11 total)

  • 214 Main St. Corp. v. Tanksley, 947 So. 2d 490 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006)
    …rtiorari relief to tenant and upholding default under section 83.232(5) where tenant failed to abide by terms of stipulated agreement that rent be paid directly to landlord during pendency of litigation); Courthouse Tower, Ltd. v. Manzini & Assocs., 683 So. 2d 215 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (granting mandamus relief and requiring trial court to issue immediate writ of possession as required by section 83.232(5)); Premici v. United Growth Props., L.P., 648 So. 2d 1241 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (interpreting section 83.232(5…
  • Poal WK Taft, LLC v. Johnson Med. Ctr. Corp., 45 So. 3d 37 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)
    …2008); Kosoy Kendall Assocs., LLC v. Los Latinos Rest. Inc., 10 So. 3d 1168 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009). Although the result may seem harsh in a case like this, there is no equitable exception to the statute. See Courthouse Tower, Ltd. v. Manzini & Assocs., 683 So. 2d 215 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). We therefore grant the petition for mandamus. We withhold the issuance of the writ, as we are assured that the trial court will act in accordance -with this opinion and issue the writ of possession to the landlord. We note that…
  • Blandin v. BAY Porte Condo. Ass'n, Inc., 988 So. 2d 666 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)
    …h instances, sought to exercise its discretion out of fairness, a trial court may not decline to follow controlling law on the ground that it may consider its application inequitable in a particular case. Courthouse Tower, Ltd. v. Manzini & Assocs., 683 So. 2d 215 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (citation omitted). Though not necessary to have prevailed on his appeal, Blandin asks this court to go one step further and find that, under section 83.232, a trial court has the discretion to allow a pre-deadline extension only…

Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw