MARCO MORALES, ET AL., APPELLANTS,

v.

METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Miller v. Scottsdale Ins. Co., 932 So. 2d 1028 (Fla. 2006)
  …pted cancellation by the premium finance company.” Id. We went on to state that “[b]e-cause notice was required under the con [*1033] tract, notice was also required under the statute.” Id. Similarly, in American Reliance Insurance Co. v. Martinez, 683 So. 2d 575 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996), the Third District upheld a jury’s verdict that an insured’s efforts to cancel its own insurance policy were ineffective when the insurer had not provided the mortgagee and loss payee with proper notice of cancellation. Id. at 57…
• Miller v. Scottsdale Ins. Co., 410 F.3d 678 (11th Cir. 2005)
  …opy of the notice of cancellation from the premium finance company. . In addition to the cases discussed herein, Fidelity and Deposit Co. of Maryland v. First State Ins. Co., 611 So. 2d 266 (Fla.1996) and American Reliance Ins. Co. v. Martinez, 683 So. 2d 575 (1996) are instructive. In Fidelity, the Florida Supreme Court reversed the district court’s determination that a policy was effectively cancelled when the mortgagee was given oral rather than written notice of a policy cancellation. The court rel…

Authorities Cited

• Metro. Dade Cnty. v. Braude, 593 So. 2d 563 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)