TRIDENT SHIPWORKS, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
MAGNUM MARINE CORPORATION, APPELLEE
TRIDENT SHIPWORKS, INC., APPELLANT,
MAGNUM MARINE CORPORATION, APPELLEE
683 So. 2d 1170
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1996)
Caution
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Thornton v. DeBerry, 548 So. 2d 1177 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)(trial court ruling on motion to change venue will not be disturbed absent abuse of discretion); Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Florida Physicians’ Ins. Reciprocal, 507 So. 2d 778 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)(same); Hu v. Crockett, 426 So. 2d 1275 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)(same).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rinaldo Cruz v. Caribbean Spring Vill., 944 So. 2d 1161 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)…he default and default judgment, because the attorney there never filed any pleadings and failed to appear at a properly noticed motion for summary judgment. Additionally, there was no claim of abandonment by counsel in Herrick. See Yusem v. Butler, 683 So. 2d 1170 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (reversing the trial [*1163] court’s order which denied a motion to vacate a default where the defendant’s attorney abandoned his clients without notice and vacated his Florida office). We therefore agree that the trial court did…
-
Motors v. Miami Medley Bus. & Indus., LLC., 116 So. 3d 503 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013)…006), we affirmed an order granting a client’s motion to vacate and set aside a default judgment where, similarly, “there was ample evidence to find that [the client] was not involved in any way in disobeying” court orders. See also Yusem v. Butler, 683 So. 2d 1170 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (reversing denial of motion to vacate default where failure of client to answer complaint was excusable neglect due to abandonment by counsel); Crystal Lake Golf Course, Inc. v. Kalin, 252 So. 2d 379 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971) (reversin…
-
Ansaroff v. Laureles (Fla. 3d DCA 2026)…rial court did not grossly abuse its discretion in finding excusable neglect. Excusable neglect is established when a client's failure to respond results from an attorney's abandonment, rather than their client's own negligence. See Yusem v. Butler, 683 So. 2d 1170, 1171 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (finding excusable neglect where “[a]ppellants' attorney, abandoned his clients without notice . . . . Accordingly, service of an amended complaint by appellees upon . . . the lawyer's vacated Florida office . . . could not…
Authorities Cited
- Stephen C.S. HU v. Crockett, 426 So. 2d 1275 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)
- Fla. Patient's Comp. Fund v. Fla. Physicians' Ins. Reciprocal, 507 So. 2d 778 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
- D.L. Thornton, M.D. v. DeBERRY, 548 So. 2d 1177 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)