THOMAS HOUSTON PARRISH, APPELLANT,
v.
HARRY K. SINGLETARY, JR., SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1996-12-17
No. 96-1646
ALLEN, WEBSTER and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.
684 So. 2d 313 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1996) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s petition for extraordinary relief, but do so without prejudice to his right to pursue available administrative remedies with respect to his claim, and upon the exhaustion of those remedies, to again seek judicial relief, if necessary.

ALLEN, WEBSTER and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Mowe v. Mowe, 734 So. 2d 602 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)
    …roperty and the alimony award. Because the former husband’s income is substantially greater than the former wife’s, the trial court abused its discretion in ordering [*603] each party to pay his or her own attorney’s fees. See, e.g., Sever v. Sever, 684 So. 2d 313 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Tanck v. Tanck, 675 So. 2d 1039 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). Accordingly, we affirm the final judgment except as to the trial court’s failure to order the former husband to pay the former wife’s attorney’s fees. AFFIRMED in part and R…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw