SAM LOPEZ, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
SAM LOPEZ, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
684 So. 2d 342
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1996)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We find that the court’s failure to conduct a hearing pursuant to Nelson v. State, 274 So. 2d 256 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973) was not error where appellant never challenged the competence of his trial counsel. Smith v. State, 641 So. 2d 1319, 1321 (Fla.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 1129, 130 L.Ed.2d 1091 (1995); Bodiford v. State, 665 So. 2d 315, 316 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Kearse v. State, 605 So. 2d 534, 536 & n. 3 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), rev. denied, 613 So. 2d 5 (Fla.1993). We further find no merit to the remaining issue on appeal.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Claudio Reinoso v. State, 685 So. 2d 1038 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)…PER CURIAM. As in Suarez v. State, 684 So. 2d 342 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996), this appeal from the denial of the appellant’s 3.800 motion is dismissed without prejudice as mooted by Gwong v. Singletary, 683 So. 2d 109 (Fla. 1996).…
Authorities Cited
- Nelson v. State, 274 So. 2d 256 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973)
- Kearse v. State, 605 So. 2d 534 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)
- Smith v. State, 641 So. 2d 1319 (Fla. 1994)
- Bodiford v. State, 665 So. 2d 315 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)