GORDON REDD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A mandatory minimum sentence for firearm possession under section 775.087(2) cannot be imposed without a jury finding that the defendant was in actual possession of the firearm.
Appellant was convicted of several crimes involving a firearm and sentenced to a mandatory minimum term. The evidence did not conclusively establish A…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Jury Finding cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Gordon Redd, appeals his conviction and sentence for attempted second degree murder with a firearm, robbery with a firearm, burglary of an occupied structure with a firearm, false imprisonment with a firearm, and aggravated assault with a firearm. We affirm Appellant’s conviction and sentence, but vacate that portion of the sentence imposing a three-year minimum mandatory sentence for possession of a firearm.
Section 775.087(2), Florida Statutes (1993), provides that any person convicted of murder, robbery, burglary, or aggravated battery, who had in his or her possession a firearm, must be sentenced to a minimum three-year prison term. However, even though sufficient evidence exists to uphold a conviction, this does not mean that an enhanced sentence may be imposed under section 775.087 merely on the basis of the finding of guilt. Hough v. State, 448 So. 2d 628, 629 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984). Where the defendant participated in the crime with others, the three-year mandatory penalty under section 775.087(2) cannot be imposed in the absence of a jury finding that the defendant was in actual possession of the firearm. Leonard v. State, 660 So. 2d 1172 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); see State v. Overfelt, 457 So. 2d 1385, 1387 (Fla.1984); Rivas v. State, 591 So. 2d 649 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).
In the instant case, Appellant committed the crimes with two accomplices. The evidence at trial did not conclusively establish that Appellant was in actual possession of a firearm. Thus, since the jury did not make a specific finding that Appellant was in possession of a firearm, the three-year mandatory minimum sentence must be set aside. Leonard, 660 So. 2d at 1172; Rivas, 591 So. 2d at 649. Accordingly, we remand to the trial court with directions to delete the three-year prison term from Appellant’s sentence. Leonard, 660 So. 2d at 1172.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.
GUNTHER, C.J., and WARNER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Blaine Alleman, 744 So. 2d 465 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998)…n’s motion to dismiss three counts of trafficking in hy-drocodone. We affirm on the authority of State v. Perry, 716 So. 2d 827 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), and State v. Holland, 689 So. 2d 1268 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), and certify conflict with State v. Baxley, 684 So. 2d 881 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996), which held that a defendant who sells four grams or more of hydrocodone could be subject to prosecution for trafficking in hydrocodone. PARKER, C.J., BLUE and QUINCE, JJ., Concur.…
-
Roberts v. State, 736 So. 2d 121 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)…ed crime while using a firearm either by finding defendant guilty of crime involving firearm or by answering specific question of special verdict form so indicating); and State v. Overfelt, 457 So. 2d 1385, 1387 (Fla.1984) (same); cf. Redd v. State, 684 So. 2d 881 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (mandatory minimum sentence for use of firearm during armed robbery improper where evidence at trial failed to establish conclusively that defendant actually possessed firearm). Although there was more than one perpetrator of t…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Overfelt, 457 So. 2d 1385 (Fla. 1984)
- Brewster v. State, 448 So. 2d 628 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)
- Tondrick Hough v. State, 448 So. 2d 628 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984)
- Rivas v. State, 591 So. 2d 649 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)
- Leonard v. State, 660 So. 2d 1172 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)