JUAN CASTRO, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JUAN CASTRO, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
685 So. 2d 27
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1996)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm appellant’s three convictions under section 316.193(3)(c)l, Florida Statutes (1993). State v. Salazar, 679 So. 2d 1183, (Fla. 1996); Melbourne v. State, 679 So. 2d 759, (Fla. 1996). We reverse that portion of the written order' of probation which indicates that appellant may perform community service in lieu of costs of supervision. E.g., Royster v. State, 657 So. 2d 36 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded to the trial court for the entry of an amended order of probation.
GLICKSTEIN, FARMER and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Juan and Julia Romay, 744 So. 2d 467 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)…is a refusal to arbitrate so as to mandate appraisal. However, before a court can compel a party to participate in arbitration there must first exist an arbitrable issue. See § 682.03, Fla. Stat. (1995); Phillips v. General Accident Ins. Co. of Am., 685 So. 2d 27, 29 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (interpreting the Florida Arbitration Code, § 682.03, Fla. Stat. (1987) as limiting the courts’ consideration of claims for arbitration to 1) whether a valid written agreement exists containing an arbitration clause; 2) whethe…
-
ARI Mut. Ins. Co. v. Hogen, 734 So. 2d 574 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)…ARI correctly argues that it is well-settled in Florida that the trial court’s role when considering applications to compel arbitration includes determining whether the right to arbitrate was waived. Phillips v. General Accident Ins. Co. of America, 685 So. 2d 27, 29 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Chicago Ins. Co. v. Tarr, 638 So. 2d 106, 108 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Piercy v. School Bd. of Washington County, Fla., 576 So. 2d 806, 807 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). However, Hogen, in opposition, cites to Federated Department Stores,…
-
DFC Homes OF Florida v. Lawrence, 8 So. 3d 1281 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)…s and interrogatories requested by Lawrence, was “limited in scope and ... purpose ... to obtaining] information relevant to the trial court’s determination of whether the right to arbitration was present.” Phillips v. Gen. Accident Ins. Co. of Am., 685 So. 2d 27, 29 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). Again, the original dispute had been resolved at arbitration, and the substance or merits of the case or any new claims were never considered by the court. Lawrence relies on Transamerica Insurance Co. v. Weed, 420 So. 2d 37…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Jeanie H. Melbourne v. State, 679 So. 2d 759 (Fla. 1996)
- Royster v. State, 657 So. 2d 36 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)
- Carey Core v. State, 657 So. 2d 36 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)
- State v. Laurentino Bravo Salazar, 679 So. 2d 1183 (Fla. 1996)
- Ratliff v. State, 679 So. 2d 1183 (Fla. 1996)