IAN SIMMONS, APPELLANT,
v.
ROYAL FLORAL DISTRIBUTORS, INC., APPELLEE
IAN SIMMONS, APPELLANT,
ROYAL FLORAL DISTRIBUTORS, INC., APPELLEE
685 So. 2d 962
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1996)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
After the appellant violated his noncom-pete agreement with his former employer, the trial court enjoined him from breaching that agreement any further. He continued to do so, and the trial court then entered the order which is the subject of this appeal in which appellant was found in contempt. We affirm the order in all respects, except for the fact that it is not limited to the same geographical area as is provided in the non-compete agreement and the earlier injunction. We therefore remand for that purpose.
Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
GLICKSTEIN, KLEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Simmons v. Royal Floral Distribs., Inc, 697 So. 2d 547 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)…PER CURIAM. Ian Simmons appeals an order purporting to conform a previously appealed contempt order entered against him to this court’s decision in the prior appeal, Simmons v. Royal Floral Distributors, Inc., 685 So. 2d 962 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). As the trial court misinterpreted our prior opinion, we reverse. Simmons had signed a noncompete agreement with his former employer, Royal Floral. The first numbered paragraph required Simmons to hold in confidence information…
-
Nat'l Enters., Inc. v. Vinas, 735 So. 2d 558 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)…of the liabilities under the note, including attorney’s fees incurred from collecting under the note. The guaranty does not provide for attorney’s fees incurred from enforcing the liability of the guarantor. See Weigert v. Trade Wind Ventures, Inc., 685 So. 2d 962, 964 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Kim v. Peoples Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 538 So. 2d 867, 869 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). ' Affirmed in part; reversed in part.…