BILAL M. CHAAR, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Deportation Consequences cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The order denying appellant Bilal M. Chaar’s petition for writ of coram nobis is affirmed. In 1987 Chaar pled nolo contende-re to possession of cocaine and drug paraphernalia, and successfully completed a period of probation. Under threat of deportation proceeding's, Chaar departed from the United States and has been denied reentry. He petitioned for coram nobis, seeking to vacate his plea on the ground that he did not know the plea would render him ineligible for reentry. We affirm the trial court’s denial of relief on authority of State v. Ginebra, 511 So. 2d 960 (Fla.1987)
; see also State v. Fox, 659 So. 2d 1324 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), review denied, 668 So. 2d 602 (Fla.1996).
Affirmed.
. The rule governing pleas was changed effective January 1, 1989, to require a warning regarding possible deportation consequences. See In re Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, 536 So. 2d 992, 994 (Fla.1988); Fla.R.Crim. P. 3.172(c)(8).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Medina v. State, 711 So. 2d 256 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)…ion relief based on a claimed failure to advise of immigration consequences, because there was no duty to render such advice at that time. See State v. Ginebra, 511 So. 2d 960 (Fla.1987) (rejecting availability of Rule 3.850 relief); Chaar v. State, 685 So. 2d 1037. (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (rejecting availability of eoram nobis relief).1 Second, Medina contends that his plea agreement was for a withholding of adjudication, and that the judgment incorrectly reflects that he was adjudicated guilty. We conclude that…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Ginebra, 511 So. 2d 960 (Fla. 1987)
- State v. A.J. FOX, 659 So. 2d 1324 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)
- In re Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, 536 So. 2d 992 (Fla. 1988)