TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY, A CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
L. C. HEIDT, APPELLEE
TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY, A CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
L. C. HEIDT, APPELLEE
82 Fla. 176
Florida Supreme Court (1921)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the decree aforesaid, and briefs and arguments of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that under the authority of Florida Southern R. Co. v. Hill, 40 Fla. 1, 23 South. Rep. 566, the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.
All concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
E. Fla. Tel. Co. v. Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co., 85 Fla. 378 (Fla. 1923)…. 146; Jacksonville, T. & K. W. Ry. Co. v. Lockwood, 33 Fla. 573, 15 South. Rep. 327; Jarrett Lumber Corp. v. Christopher, 65 Fla., 379, 61 South. Rep. 831; Florida Southern R. Co. v. Hill, 40 Fla. 1, 23 South. Rep. 566; Tampa Electric Co. v. Heidt, 82 Fla. 176, 89 South. Rep. 431; 28 Cyc. 1128 Notes; Carney v. Hadley, 32 Fla. 344, 14 South. Rep. 4; 36 L. R. A. (N. S.) 832 Notes; 20 C. J. 1180. A different rule may apply1 where there is no right of eminent domain in the trespasser or where special equities…1 / 2
Authorities Cited
- The Fla. S. R.R. Co. v. Hill, 40 Fla. 1 (Fla. 1898)