JOSEPH MATTHEW HOLLISTER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1995-12-20
No. 94-03254
RYDER, A.C.J., and DANAHY and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.
686 So. 2d 2 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1995)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court affirmed the denial of the motion to suppress but struck certain probationary conditions and costs that were not orally pronounced at sentencing.


Facts & Procedural History

The appellant challenged the denial of his motion to suppress evidence and the imposition of certain probationary conditions and court costs. The evid…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Joseph Matthew Hollister, challenges the denial of his motion to suppress evidence of contraband found in his possession. We, however, find no error with respect to the denial of Hollister’s motion and affirm.

Hollister also challenges the imposition of certain probationary conditions and court costs. In that regard, we conclude that the trial court improperly imposed a condition of probation which prohibits Hollister from using intoxicants to excess, without orally pronouncing that condition at sentencing. See Malone v. State, 652 So. 2d 902 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). We therefore strike that condition.

We also strike the imposition of a $33 cost/fine, which was not orally pronounced at sentencing and for which no statutory basis was referenced. See Reyes v. State, 655 So. 2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Barnes v. State, 658 So. 2d 538 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). Further, the $2 cost imposed pursuant to section 943.25(13), Florida Statutes (1993), must also be stricken because it is a discretionary cost which required oral pronouncement at sentencing. Reyes.

Accordingly, the instant cause is affirmed in part and stricken in part.

RYDER, A.C.J., and DANAHY and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw