MICHAEL FLOYD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1996-06-05
No. 96-01075
DANAHY, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and FRANK, JJ., concur.
686 So. 2d 14 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1996)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The trial court's denial of a motion for additional jail time credit must be reversed if the court fails to attach the relied-upon jail records.


Facts & Procedural History

Michael Floyd appealed the trial court's denial of his motion for additional jail time credit. The trial court examined arrest and sentencing dates fo…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Topics

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Jail Credit cases and more on FLexlaw


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Michael Floyd appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion in which he sought additional credit for time served in the county jail prior to sentencing. In its order, the trial court examined arrest and sentencing dates for the three crimes for which he was sentenced, and concluded that the credit awarded at sentencing was correct.

The trial court failed to append to its order the source of its information, Pinellas County Jail records. This court has consistently held that record attachments are required for our review of denials of motions seeking additional jail credit. Becton v. State, 668 So. 2d 1107 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Summemll v. State, 637 So. 2d '370 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).

Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order. Should the trial court again deny the motion, it must attach the records upon which it relies to the order. Further review by Floyd of any subsequent action of the trial court must be sought within thirty days of the rendering of the order. Reversed and remanded.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and FRANK, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw