STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,
v.
RICHARD VARIANCE, RESPONDENT
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Contemporaneous Objection Rule cases and more on FLexlaw
SHAW, Justice.
We have for review Variance v. State, 687 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), on motion for certification, 21 Fla. L. Weekly D1052 (Fla. 4th DCA May 1, 1996), wherein the district court certified two questions.1 We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We quash Variance, based on State v. Wilson, 686 So. 2d 569 (Fla.1996), wherein we held that the giving of a nearly identical instruction did not constitute fundamental error and required a contemporaneous objection to be preserved for review.
It is so ordered.
KOGAN, C.J., and OVERTON, GRIMES, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur. . The court certified:
1) Does the "jury instruction given in this case impermissibly reduce the reasonable doubt standard below the protections of the due process clause?
2) If so, is such an instruction fundamental error?
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- State v. Milo Wilson, 686 So. 2d 569 (Fla. 1996)
- Variance v. State, 687 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)