BABAK PARISSAY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Probation Conditions cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Babak Parissay appeals an order revoking probation in which the trial court found that Parissay violated three conditions of probation. We affirm the trial court’s finding that Parissay violated condition five of his probation but vacate the other findings of violation for the reason that those conditions were imposed by the probation officer rather than by the sentencing court. A probation officer may implement routine supervisory directions to carry out conditions imposed by the court, but the officer may not impose new conditions of probation. Haynes v. State, 440 So. 2d 661 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).
Condition five of Parissay’s probation order required that he “live and remain at liberty without violating any law....” The record supports the trial court’s finding that Parissay’s threats to his former wife and her present husband constituted a violation of the criminal extortion statute. See § 836.05, Fla. Stat. (1995).
AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED IN PART.
PETERSON, C.J., and THOMPSON and ANTOON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dep't of Hwy. Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Roberts, 938 So. 2d 513 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)…Fla.2003); Blue v. State, 837 So. 2d 541 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Dep’t of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Silva, 806 So. 2d 551 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Seago v. State, 768 So. 2d 498 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Dep’t of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Smith, 687 So. 2d 30, 33 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); Dep’t of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Favino, 667 So. 2d 305 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); State v. Riehl, 504 So. 2d 798, 800 (Fla. 2d DCA), review denied, 513 So. 2d 1063 (Fla.1987). When determining whether probable cause is…
-
State v. Whitley, 846 So. 2d 1163 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)…and practical experience, and of which he has reasonable trustworthy information, are sufficient in themselves for a reasonable man to reach the conclusion that an offense has been committed.’” Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Smith, 687 So. 2d 30, 33 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997) (quoting City of Jacksonville v. Alexander, 487 So. 2d 1144, 1146 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)); see also Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Silva, 806 So. 2d 551, 554 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Department of Highway Safety & M…
-
Dep't OF Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Marshall, 848 So. 2d 482 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)…rm the statements she alleges the officer made to her. It appears that the circuit court substituted its own determination of the facts and evidence for the findings of the hearing officer. Cf. Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Smith, 687 So. 2d 30 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997) (circuit court improperly reweighed evidence); Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Satter, 643 So. 2d 692 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). Finally, the circuit court overturned the final order of license suspension on the basis…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Haynes v. State, 440 So. 2d 661 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)