STEVEN M. BAKER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
STEVEN M. BAKER, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
687 So. 2d 64
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1997)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The defendant, Steven M. Baker, was found guilty of two counts of sexual battery in violation of section 794.011(5), Florida Statutes (1995). At sentencing, the trial court assessed 40 points for two counts of penetration, totaling 80 points for victim injury. The record supports a finding of penetration in only one of the two sexual batteries. Thus, 40 points should have been assessed for the one count in which penetration occurred, and 18 points should have been assessed for the other count which involved only contact. Proper calculation of the scoresheet places the defendant in a lower sentencing cell. Accordingly, we reverse the sentence and remand for resentencing.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
DAUKSCH, GRIFFIN and ANTOON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In re Est. OF Norah H. Clibbon v. Falconer, 735 So. 2d 487 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)…r an exception under the common law for fraud, which was not alleged in Jackson and Yellen. We agree with appellants that an estate which has been closed can be reopened for the type of intentional misconduct which amounts to fraud. Liechty v. Hall, 687 So. 2d 64 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)(fraud is recognized as a justification for reopening an estate, even after an order of discharge has been entered), and cases cited therein. We do not find that appellants’ allegations could amount to fraud. The essence of these…
-
Dean v. Bentley, 848 So. 2d 487 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)…08 and 733.109, Florida Statutes, provide that a petition for revocation of probate should be filed before discharge, fraud is recognized as justification for' reopening an estate, even after an order for discharge has been entered. Liechty v. Hall, 687 So. 2d 64, 65 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); Padgett v. Padgett’s Estate, 318 So. 2d 484, 485 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). Also, Rule 1.540(b), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure provides that “[o]n motion and upon such terms as are just, the court may relieve a party or a party…