JOHN OLSON, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
John Olson appeals from sentences entered following the revocation of Ms probation and sentencing on the underlying charge and subsequent conviction on a separate charge. As entered, these sentences are to run consecutively; however, the written plea agreement contemplates concurrent sentences. TMs case is remanded with directions to either sentence the defendant in accordance with the written agreement or allow him the opportumty to withdraw Ms plea. Kirkman v. State, 559 So. 2d 695 (Fla. 3d DCA)(sentence vacated and remanded when the trial court imposed a sentence other than that contemplated in the written plea agreement without explicitly giving the defendant the opportumty to withdraw the plea), review denied, 574 So. 2d 143 (Fla.1990).
Vacated and remanded.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Poppy Chimerakis v. Sentry Ins. Mut. Co., 744 So. 2d 1250 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. United States Fidelity & Guar. Co. v. Romay, 744 So. 2d 467 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Gonzalez v. Fortune Fla. Residential Property & Cas. Joint Underwriters Associates, 687 So. 2d 71 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Goldman v. State Farm Fire Gen. Ins. Co., 660 So. 2d 300 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), review denied, 670 So. 2d 938 (Fla.1996); Stringer v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. [*1251] Co., 622 So. 2d 145 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993), review denied, 630 So. 2d 110…
Authorities Cited
- Kirkman v. State, 559 So. 2d 695 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)