THOMAS JAMES, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
THOMAS JAMES, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
687 So. 2d 364
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1997)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Because the State’s justifications for peremptorily challenging the prospective jurors were facially race-neutral and genuine, we affirm. See State v. Holiday, 682 So. 2d 1092 (Fla.1996); Melbourne v. State, 679 So. 2d 759 (Fla.1996).
Affirmed..
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. In re Deborah Claudia Ezeta vs. Gregory Francois Frederic De La Begassiere, 262 So. 3d 207 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)…cause any alleged error was not preserved. Chaiken v. Lewis, 754 So. 2d 118, 118 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (holding that a party that acquiesced to a trial court determination did not preserve the issue for appellate review); Kitchens By Design v. Confino, 687 So. 2d 364, 365 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) ("We affirm the final judgment under review as the record does not reflect that the specific claim of error made on appeal was argued and presented to the lower court."). Affirmed.…
-
Dept. of Revenue v. De La Begassiere (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)…cause any alleged error was not preserved. Chaiken v. Lewis, 754 So. 2d 118, 118 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (holding that a party that acquiesced to a trial court determination did not preserve the issue for appellate review); Kitchens By Design v. Confino, 687 So. 2d 364, 365 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (“We affirm the final judgment under review as the record does not reflect that the specific claim of error made on appeal was argued and presented to the lower court.”). Affirmed.…
Authorities Cited
- Jeanie H. Melbourne v. State, 679 So. 2d 759 (Fla. 1996)
- State v. Holiday, 682 So. 2d 1092 (Fla. 1996)