MARIA RODRIGUEZ, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF RAUL RODRIGUEZ, DECEASED, APPELLANT,
v.
FLOVAL OIL CORPORATION, SILVESTRE OTTO MEDEROS, SENOBIO RODRIGUEZ AND THE B.F. GOODRICH COMPANY, APPELLEES; SENOBIO RODRIGUEZ, APPELLANT, V. MARIA RODRIGUEZ, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF RAUL RODRIGUEZ, DECEASED, FLOVAL OIL CORPORATION, SILVESTRE OTTO MEDEROS AND THE B.F. GOODRICH COMPANY, APPELLEES
MARIA RODRIGUEZ, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF RAUL RODRIGUEZ, DECEASED, APPELLANT,
FLOVAL OIL CORPORATION, SILVESTRE OTTO MEDEROS, SENOBIO RODRIGUEZ AND THE B.F. GOODRICH COMPANY, APPELLEES; SENOBIO RODRIGUEZ, APPELLANT, V. MARIA RODRIGUEZ, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF RAUL RODRIGUEZ, DECEASED, FLOVAL OIL CORPORATION, SILVESTRE OTTO MEDEROS AND THE B.F. GOODRICH COMPANY, APPELLEES
688 So. 2d 7
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1997)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
In these consolidated appeals, appellants appeal the summary final judgment entered in favor of appellees Floval Oil Corporation and Silvestre Otto Mederos. When the record evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to appellants, there are genuine issues of material fact which require resolution by a jury. See, e.g., Sammartino v. Butt-Baker, 599 So. 2d 263 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). We reverse the summary judgment and remand for farther proceedings.
FARMER, STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., concur.