ADOLFO LEVANTE, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
CHRISTINA CORALLO, ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that a default judgment was improperly entered because the plaintiff misled the defendants into believing responsive pleadings were unnecessary due to ongoing settlement negotiations.
The parties were engaged in settlement negotiations for an insurance dispute. The plaintiff initiated a wrongful death action before fulfilling a sett…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Vacating Default Judgment cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The Levantes, defendants in a wrongful death suit, appeal from an order denying their motion to vacate a default judgment. We reverse and remand with directions to vacate the default.
The parties were involved in negotiations to settle an insurance dispute. A condition of the settlement was that Ms. Corallo’s attorney was to provide an amended death certificate to the Levantes’ insurance company; the insurance company was then to tender the policy limits. However, Ms. Corallo initiated a wrongful death action before she produced the amended death certificate. The Levantes’ insurance company did not answer the complaint, but instead relied upon the negotiation process. Counsel for Ms. Corallo then sent a letter demanding that the insurance company answer the complaint within six days; this letter was received on the fifth day and default was entered one day later. Based upon these facts — that the defendants were misled by the plaintiff into believing responsive pleadings were unnecessary due to ongoing negotiations — the plaintiff may not now obtain a default judgment after such inadequate notice. See Weeks Cartage, Inc. v. CSX Transp., 547 So. 2d 237 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); American Republic Ins. Co. v. Westchester Gen. Hosp., 414 So. 2d 1163 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Rubenstein v. Richard Fidlin Corp., 346 So. 2d 89 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).
Reversed and remanded.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Rubenstein v. Richard Fidlin Corp. & Richard Fidlin, 346 So. 2d 89 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)
- Am. Republic Ins. Co. v. Westchester Gen. Hosp., 414 So. 2d 1163 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
- Weeks Cartage, Inc. v. CSX Transp., 547 So. 2d 237 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)