HOWARD HOOD AND RANDOLPH HOOD, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
HOWARD HOOD AND RANDOLPH HOOD, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
100 Fla. 1648
Florida Supreme Court (1931)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the circuit court be and the same is hereby affirmed.
Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield and Buford, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fowler v. Turner, 157 Fla. 529 (Fla. 1945)…nd recognizes them as separate and distinct school funds. Funds of one special tax school district cannot be appropriated to the obligations of another special tax school district. Board of Public Instruction of Pinellas County v. Knight & Wall Co., 100 Fla. 1648, 132 So. 644. It appears by the record that Special Tax School District No. 2 has a bonded debt of $6,269,000.00, with an unexpended balance of $1,568,723.67, while Tax School District No. 4 has a bonded debt of. $416,000.00, with an unexpended bal…