ROBERT REDIKER, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

• Knorr v. Knorr, 751 So. 2d 64 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999)
  …ion, we conclude that prejudgment civil contempt orders are more properly reviewed by certio-rari. See Sears v. Sears, 617 So. 2d 807 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Stewart v. Mussoline, 487 So. 2d 96 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). But see Alves v. Barnett Mortgage Co., 688 So. 2d 459 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). The January order held Mr. Knorr in contempt for, among other things, failing to comply with an August 25, 1998 directive that he pay certain bills. Attached to the August order was a list of bills totaling $26,598.30 which Mr.…
• Remington v. Remington, 705 So. 2d 920 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)
  …eeding “is renewable as an appeal from a non-final order entered after final judgment pursuant to Rule 9.130(a)(4), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.” Dehler v. Dehler, 639 So. 2d 1128 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); see also Alves v. Barnett Mortgage Co., 688 So. 2d 459, 460 n. 1 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). However, the holding of Dehler merely describes the procedural rule authorizing the appeal; it does not characterize a post-judgment contempt order as being “non-final” for all purposes. The position espoused by the fo…
• Calicchio v. Calicchio, 693 So. 2d 1124 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)
  …allahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla.1979). Affirmed. GLICKSTEIN, WARNER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur. . Whether this order is an appropriate subject for a non-final appeal has, of late, received attention in our court. See Alves v. Barnett Mortgage Co., 688 So. 2d 459 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (Farmer, J., specially concurring). We agree that there is a question as to the jurisdictional basis to review this non-final order. However, we have in the past permitted review, citing Fla.R.App.P. 9.130(a)(3)(C)(ii) and (iii).…